A 12 Euro flight from Barcelona
(Girona) to Milan (Bergamo) on a Friday night seemed too good to be
true. When it landed 2 hours late in the wrong city, I knew it was. Welcome to
Ryanair.
Parts of the story made
sense. Maintenance problems were discovered just prior to takeoff, forcing
passengers, crew, and luggage to change planes. Pushing the already-late
takeoff to 2 hours later caused issues at the destination airport,
which diverted the flight to a nearby airport.
But other parts defied
logic. What kind of aircraft service operation requires the technician to
scurry back and forth to his office inside the terminal to perform some
calculations? Why was our flight prevented from changing planes to allow four
successive incoming flights to land, when the only chance we had to arrive
at our destination airport was to switch immediately? And how could the flight
crew possibly wait until 20 minutes to landing to notify us that we would be
landing not at Bergamo but at Verona?
Upon arrival in Verona
at 2am, passengers were promised a bus back to Bergamo Airport, 100km away.
This did not seem particularly appetizing as we understood the airport there
was closed - hence what ground transportation could we hope to find, not least
for those hoping to connect via bus to Milan? Nonetheless we waited outside the
airport. 45 minutes went by and the bus showed no sign of materializing. The
pilot and crew had sneaked off in a van (so much for the notion of the captain
going down with the ship). There was no airport staff anywhere. And so, my
girlfriend and I made the only choice that seemed available. We hailed the only
cab at the airport and asked him to take us to the Verona Airport Hotel,
visible in the distance. A short while and 125 Euros later (hotel and cab
fare), we were finally asleep.
Was it an unfortunate
series of bad breaks or deliberate
mismanagement and utter disregard for the customer? For me,
there is too much evidence in favor of the latter. I understand that
maintenance delays are part of air travel but the airline had so many contact
points at which to improve both its operations and its service to avoid
stranding us in Verona.
My attempts to claim
reimbursement for the cab and hotel have further illustrated Ryanair's
disregard for the customer. According to European Law (EU Regulation 261 / 2004), airlines are required to
reimburse passengers for expenses incurred due to a delay longer than 2
hours. Ryanair's website makes it seem like they only reimburse for cancelled flights,
which is in blatant disagreement with the law, but their online claims
submission form doesn't even work so I had to send a letter through fax
instead. The response came through a week later (to my email address), ignoring
the distinction between a delay and a cancellation but still asserting
innocence because, Ryanair claimed, factors outside the airline's
control had caused the flight to be diverted from Bergamo to Verona.
Ryanair's
maneuver was a decent example of what insurance companies used to do
- deny your claim automatically under some justification and hope you
would go away. But it ignored the 2-hour delay which actually caused the
diversion, a glaring oversight. It's not as if the flight took off on time and
had to change course due to, for instance, a tornado in Bergamo (don't laugh;
tornadoes actually do accur in northeast Italy). I spelled this out in my next
letter and said that if my claim was not paid I would elevate it to the
Italian air travel authority, which could subject Ryanair to a € 5,000
fine.
The next response
arrived a few days later and, while again denying blame, said the airline had
decided to pay my claim in full via a check. The check eventually did arrive,
though after three weeks instead of two as the airline promised.
Meanwhile, I decided to see if I could verify Ryanair's ever-present claim that it is the "No.1 on-time airline in Europe with the least flight disruptions; as detailed in audited statistics issued by the UK Civil Aviation Authority." I ran some numbers on
the 2011 data, analyzing 1.4mn flights, the output of
which is below. Ryanair's performance is not bad according to this data.
Nonetheless, I believe the claim is wrong for 3 reasons:
1. Ryanair is NOT the most on-time
airline in Europe, according to this data. Other airlines that have less
flights are more on-time. Ryanair could choose to claim (correctly) that it is
the most on-time budget airline, or is better than British Airways, or that it
exceeds the UK average of 80% (Interestingly, the US average is 85%, according
to a recent FT piece) - instead, they opt for a boast
which sounds better but is false.
2. It is unclear whether the data is actually
audited by anyone, as the CAA says they compile it from various sources (i.e.,
the airlines themselves) and can neither certify the data's "accuracy,
integrity, or reliability" nor comment on any conclusions drawn from it.
3. The UK CAA, as its name implies, publishes data only from arrivals to UK airports. Yet Ryanair operates throughout Europe. The agency responsible for compiling Europe-wide delays is Euro Control, which says it cannot disclose data on individual airlines.
Why would Ryanair
consistently make this claim (it is ever present in communication with
customers as well as public filings)? First, to counteract well-publicized horror stories and customer
campaigns. More seriously, perhaps the airline is guilty of a bait-and-switch because they didn't like Euro Control's data.
Either way, when your flight has been delayed or cancelled the claim is of
little consolation.
Airline
|
# Flights
|
On-Time
|
Late
|
BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC
|
277,063
|
80%
|
20%
|
EASYJET AIRLINE COMPANY LTD
|
200,146
|
82%
|
18%
|
RYANAIR
|
127,843
|
85%
|
15%
|
FLYBE LTD
|
110,573
|
85%
|
15%
|
BMI BRITISH MIDLAND
|
48,558
|
78%
|
22%
|
THOMSON AIRWAYS LTD
|
40,711
|
77%
|
23%
|
LUFTHANSA
|
33,679
|
71%
|
29%
|
MONARCH AIRLINES
|
29,765
|
70%
|
30%
|
AER LINGUS
|
28,394
|
83%
|
17%
|
THOMAS COOK AIRLINES LTD
|
27,906
|
75%
|
25%
|
BA CITYFLYER LTD
|
25,416
|
86%
|
14%
|
VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIRWAYS LTD
|
19,771
|
76%
|
24%
|
SWISS AIRLINES
|
18,278
|
81%
|
19%
|
SAS
|
17,959
|
84%
|
16%
|
KLM
|
16,428
|
87%
|
13%
|
AER ARANN
|
16,210
|
84%
|
16%
|
VLM (BELGIUM)
|
15,935
|
90%
|
10%
|
WIZZ AIR
|
15,686
|
72%
|
28%
|
LOGANAIR
|
15,494
|
88%
|
12%
|
CITY JET
|
14,757
|
88%
|
12%
|
JET2.COM LTD
|
14,417
|
61%
|
39%
|
BMI REGIONAL
|
13,859
|
92%
|
8%
|
* On-time flight: Within
15 minutes of stated arrival.
I came back last night from Italy by flying with a Ryan air plain!!!and of course, it was late both time (go and back) :)
ReplyDeleteI perfectly agree with you. In my opinion, Ryan air is applying a really agressive and unfair policy, probably due to the cost reduction strategy. However, it is hard to pick a different company, because of the relevant price difference. And so, as a famous italian saying states: a little can buy a little (=con poco si compra poco)!:-)